Latest Posts
Show moreThe SEC and CFTC Propose Amending Form PF, Cryptocurrency Exposure to Be Included https://ift.tt/l3j4tkY The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted in favour of amendments to Form Private Fund (Form PF), which is required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010).
Form PF was created following the 2008 financial crisis. It is a confidential filing of assets under management to the Financial Stability Oversight Council. Private fund advisors (such as hedge funds) that have at least $150 million in fund assets must file the form.
Under the new amendments, hedge funds that have at least $500 million in assets must report their cryptocurrency exposure via Form PF. The report must also include borrowing and counterparty exposure, turnover, portfolio liquidity, financial liquidity, withdrawal and redemption rights and inflows/outflows.
As opposed to requiring to file the form on a quarterly basis or annually, material events (should they occur) must be reported within 1 business day.
The SEC Chair, Gary Gensler said the amendments will better protect investors. “In the decade since the SEC and CFTC jointly adopted Form PF, regulators have gained vital insight with respect to private funds.
"Since then, though, the private fund industry has grown in gross asset value by nearly 150 percent and evolved in terms of its business practices, complexity and investment strategies.
“I am pleased to support the proposal because, if adopted, it would improve the quality of the information we receive from all Form PF filers, with a particular focus on large hedge fund advisers. That will help protect investors and maintain fair, orderly and efficient markets.”
Since 2008, the number of private funds has increased substantially. At the beginning of 2022, there were approximately 3,800 hedge funds in the United States.
Room for Concern?
Although the amendments may allow US regulators to swiftly identify private funds that are facing difficulties, as greater information is being reported, the number of investigations may increase.
When a regulator launches a probe, investors will not remain silent. Some are expecting private funds to retaliate against the proposed reporting.
Furthermore, the SEC proposed the number of treasury trading platforms under the Fair Access Rule should be increased.
This article was written by Matti Williamson at www.financemagnates.com.
ASA Shows Red Card to Arsenal FC for Misleading Crypto Ads https://ift.tt/l3j4tkY The UK's advertising watchdog, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), has banned two advertisements by the Premier League football club, Arsenal for its crypto-based fan token scheme.
The adverts for $AFC fan tokens were deemed by the ASA to be misleading fans over the risks of cryptocurrency investing. The first advert published on August 6th, 2021 described the token, and how it could be used within the Socios app.Six days later, a second advert was uploaded on Facebook featuring Arsenal footballers Ben White, Calum Chambers and Kieran Tierney promoting the token, along with text that briefly detailed $AFC, the Chilliz ($CHZ) cryptocurrency and the Socios app.
"Took Advantage of Consumers’ Inexperience"
Despite an appeal lodged after the complaint last year, the ASA upheld its decision that the two adverts were “misleading because they failed to illustrate the risk of the investment,” and “irresponsible because they took advantage of consumers’ inexperience or credulity and trivialized engaging with and investing in crypto assets.”
Arsenal, who have finished behind their North London rivals Tottenham Hotspur for the last six seasons, initially appealed the decision, saying the warnings were enough and their audience was knowledgeable on crypto. The club also tried to argue the point that there was no regulatory basis to include information regarding capital gains taxes incurred from trading the tokens, despite them being crypto assets and, as such, subject to such rules.
However, the complaint was upheld and Arsenal's appeal was rejected. The ASA stated the Arsenal ad was misleading “because it did not make clear that the tokens were crypto assets, which could only be obtained by opening a crypto assets exchange account, and in the case of paid-for fan tokens, required the purchase of another cryptocurrency.”
The UK advertising watchdog ruled that the adverts “must not appear again in the form complained about.”The ASA also warned Arsenal:- to make it clear that investments with paid-for fan tokens are subject to volatile markets and are unregulated crypto assets.
- not to mislead consumers by omitting material like the need to open a crypto assets exchange account and purchase various cryptocurrencies in order to buy the tokens.
- to make sure future ads are not trivialized by omitting risk warnings and taking advantage of consumers’ lack of experience with crypto.
This article was written by Finance Magnates Staff at www.financemagnates.com.
